Category Archives: theatre explorations

Feminism, Theatre and the Female Identity.

 

Happy you three! Happy the Race of Men!

Born to inform or to correct the Pen.

To profits pleasures freedom and command.

Whilst we beside you but as Cyphers stand

T’increase your Numbers and to swell th’account

Of your delights which from our charms amount

And sadly are by this distinction taught

That since the Fall (by our seducement wrought)

Our is the greater losse as ours the greater fault.

 

Anne Finch, Madwoman in the Attic, pg. 8 & 9.

 

As a frantic third year during my bachelor’s degree, I ran around the library in my University continually frustrated with the literature I was reading, not to mention doing so while battling a hangover from hell. I couldn’t find any excitement in what I was reading because it didn’t relate to my anger and inquisitiveness (yes these emotions are quite close to one another), to what I wanted to try investigate as an upcoming dramaturg. I was constantly reading amazing literature from theorists like Judith Butler, Horkheimer and Adorno, brilliant mad men like Brendan Behan, and daring women like Marina Carr. But I wasn’t really getting that itch in my foot to kick arse within a theatrical space. Then I came across Anne Finch in the book Madwoman in the Attic by Gubar and Gilbert. I made this discovery while trawling through the bookshop Hodges and Figgus, trying to get more loyalty stamps so I could get another €10 off. I like to believe it was some magical literary moment, where the Gods of all the books in all of the land guided me to this book by some ephemeral music, and little fairies that live in bookshops lets call them ‘bookellas’, shouted with enthusiasm for me to buy this book. Unfortunately none of that alchemy actually occurred; the reasons for purchasing this book were superficial and mundane. I was attracted to the strange picture on the front cover and it was on discount with the other book I was buying. What is true is that it was “love at first read”. This entry is about how I became to understand the position of women and the impact they have in theatre. Specifically with the work of Caryl Churchill. Hopefully it maybe helpful to yourself as a reader to understand feminism and theatre.

 

Madwoman in the Attic is a literary analysis of the great nineteenth century female novelists. It is an interpretation that creates a thorough discussion about the female author, the construction of the female imagination and how women have been trapped in a liminal state of patriarchal standards of writing and constructing art. The reader is left with an expanded sense of awareness of the conventions that women in art and theatre are confined within. The reader is advised from the onset, that the approach to this work necessitates the ability to ‘examine, assimilate and transcend’. To truly make a positive change, a shift in consciousness is what’s required, therefore, we must follow that process.  It is not about demolishing, but analytically deconstructing the representation/semiology/linguistics of the female identity for the purpose of better growth for women, that they are not trapped in ancient forms of traditions, expectations and standards. That they are truthful to themselves which then filters to the construction of the female imagination and product. As a whole, their work investigates the traps women have unconsciously fallen as authors and readers, that we must take note of absolutely everything to truly create an authentic female. In doing so, feminism has achieved what it has set out to do, to create equal platforms that answer the needs of both genders equally. Bringing fourth, women and authors in the present moment, and the issues we must be aware of.

 

During my last year in college, I was completely and utterly fascinated by the work of Caryl Churchill. Cloud Nine, Top Girls and This is a Chair, entranced me by the intricacy of detail and dramatic scope, with a political and/or social trajectory that could make you laugh and cry at the same time. Churchill’s theatrical technique of doubled characters was particularly thought-provoking because this played with the audience’s expectations and process of narrative digestion. Why were the characters doubled? I ventured into one of her earlier works Owners, before the doubled characters had emerged. Owners is about the power of ownership, where she almost blurs the lines of ownership of our bodies and our property. Ultimately the play ends with complete destruction, the set and the characters crumble. Work after Owners most commonly had doubled characters, what had changed? In Fen most of the characters were quadrupled. While studying Churchill’s work, I did intensive research into four of her plays Owners, Fen, Cloud Nine and Top Girls. I was trying to find out the reasons for the doubled characters while exploring and the power they create within a playtext. Churchill has created all types of women in her plays, powerful women, conflicted women, historical women, who were divided between their idea of sexuality and the traditional ancient ideas of sexuality; women who were confused, irrational, rational, the list is endless. And what they had in common, they are struggling within an internal battle, they are in constant turmoil that divides themselves, creating fractures within the psyche, which brought my work back to Anne Finch’s poem, Whilst we beside you but as Cyphers stand. A cypher! What a perfect word to describe the construction of female identity. I do not say that with delight, but with some sense of relief and optimism, because this is the issue. Women have become cyphers to themselves because of the standards and expectations created by a patriarchal society. As women we have had no time to truly understand or even contemplate the needs and desires of the feminine principle. I am not talking about make-up and high heels, but women’s biological differences to men (child birth, menstruation, breasts). There is no room to be feminine within this society because it doesn’t exist. Instead we accept what is expected and get on with things. Churchill was visually exemplifying what women do everyday with her doubled characters, as a spectator this becomes troubling because, well, we have never witnessed this before or even begun to discuss this in any real way. Through analysing each play and the doubled characters I then created the Cypher complex to lend a higher understanding of the doubled characters and their dual images. Therefore the Cypher complex is a conscious and unconscious dual force of acceptance and rejection, accepting the male standards and male expectations and in turn rejecting their own biological femininity. I understand that it is problematic to define and theorise on this issue, but it is necessary, it follows Gubar and Gilbert’s process of examination, assimilation and transcendence. Resolution through all of the above as opposed to argument. I’m not a magician, I do realise problems are not resolved that easily, but I created it to begin a discussion with both women and men.

 

Furthermore I hope that creating the Cypher complex will help in the understanding of the construction and existence of certain female identity and female representation on stage and screen. And begin to create and accept feminine models of representation that answers the needs of women, that do not condemn women or men, but instead opens a dialogue for appropriate representation. It may appear to be a mad idea to some, utopian in efforts. It is not aimed at creating a utopia but to deconstruct and examine that what we perceive as truth in fact engulfs and enslaves women further. Decoding the cypher and solidifying the feminine.

 

To decode the cypher complex we can start by the following…

 

  1. Feminism for all-EVERYONE CAN BE A FEMINIST. It is not something you get printed on a t-shirt that you brag about to others, it’s meant to empower everyone. Please don’t be that person that says to a man ‘you can’t be a feminist, you have a penis’. Feminism was created to empower women and also to educate women and men about creating an equal platform.
  2. Stop judging women-Who cares what she is wearing, what she is doing, or how she lives her life, it is that woman’s choice. Nothing is achieved by being judgmental, let’s be honest it is just fear speaking when you judge. Encourage women and men to express their weird and wonderful selves, as long as it does not hurt anyone in a physical, psychological or emotional manner.
  3. Be kind-Before you shut down someone whether it is a woman or a man, try to gauge an understanding of their perspective. Be kind and understanding to everyone’s opinion, create a dialogue instead of a debate.
  4. SUPPORT-Women must support women, it is far more beneficial supporting one another. We can achieve far more if we invest our energy in supportive actions.
  5. Be understanding-I have heard a few of my friends and colleagues say ‘I don’t think I am a feminist because I have never read about it’. You don’t have to be erudite to be a feminist, to be a feminist is to have the desire and urge to want something better for all women. Fuck the books, create feminism based around you as a women and the women around you, what would help them. In turn as you help yourself and the people around you, it has this wonderful ripple effect.

 

The above points’ can apply to how you approach writing a feminist play. It does not mean you have to use the points rigidly but just to give you a higher understanding how a feminist play can operate, generate and hopefully create a new cocoon of thought about feminism in theatre in the current theatrical climate. One of which broadens our knowledge of feminism and encourages both theatre practitioner and audience to obliterate the fear of calling themselves a feminist, it doesn’t mean not shaving your armpits and making up plans on how to kill Andy Warhol, but to strengthen gender equality.

 

Thank you for reading this article, I would love to hear what you think about feminism and/if it has a place in your daily life. I will upload a bibliography of some books that I have read which have really helped me. And for any other information do not hesitate to contact me on the contact page. AND: remember…kick the fuck out of the day cause you’re amazing!

 

Thank you for reading!

All rights reserved to Katie Poushpom, k.e.cleary.

Leave a comment

Filed under theatre explorations

Dramaturg NOT Dramaturd.

Dramaturg not Dramaturd.

Far too often when people ask me about my job I hesitate to do so. Unfortunately the title of dramaturg denotes ambivalence and confusion. The profession of a dramaturg seems to be best understood within academic circles and irrelevant to many emerging theatre makers. Through my own experience in communicating with people both within and outside the theatre scene, it has provoked an all or nothing response. People who are familiar with the job and the position of a dramaturg seem to feel the need to explain everything and anything in what can only be described as an effort to prove their intelligence and sophistication. On the other hand, people who are unaware of the dramaturg jokingly overlook the role of a dramaturg because they are too distracted by the acoustic similarity between dramaturg and dramaturd. The goal of this entry is to outline some of my thoughts as a dramaturg; why a dramaturg is an important entity to involve within the theatre, what a dramaturg does, and how a dramaturg could benefit you and your work. The dramaturg has been an important figure within the theatre industry for over 200 years, yet dramaturgs still seem to look like lonely children in a playground tearfully asking the other children ‘can I be involved?’.

The meanings of the word dramaturg and dramaturgy are unstable, sometimes bitterly so- ‘Few terms in contemporary theater practice have consistently occasioned more perplexity’- yet both words can be traced back to classical antiquity.
Mary Luckhurst, Dramaturgy: A Revolution in Theatre, (Cambridge University Press), pg. 5.

The above quote is from Luckhursts beautifully informative book Dramaturgy: A Revolution in Theatre. For anyone aiming to learn a bit more about what a dramaturg is and the dramaturg’s relationship with the process and production of dramaturgy this book is a must have. Luckhurst covers the etymology of the dramaturg from the Greek Lexicon to the dramaturg’s position in the contemporary theatre. As a dramaturg, Luckhurst helped me understand what the dramaturg’s position is within the theatre structure, where are they positioned and why.
The dramaturg operates within the middle of the external and internal creative process. The dramaturg is the artistic medium that seeks to maintain the quality of art being created, like a quality surveyor. They have an understanding of absolutely everything within the dramaturgy of a production, and are then the voice of reason that reminds the production what is achievable within the creative process and what may be obstructive to it. Unlike any other position within the theatre structure, the dramaturg has the privilege of witnessing the creative process from close proximity but with an objective opinion. Fine then, if we take that into consideration what the frig is a dramaturg!

A dramaturg is a mediator and translator that exists in a neutral artistic position within the theatre. They mediate between the text/artistic intent/ performance to the Production Company and audience. It is the entity that harmonises the theatre company’s efficacy to the audience, acting as a mediator. It acts as translator within the company or production through intense research and development of the piece of work. By this process they have the integrity and insight to pose questions and creative opinions to ensure that the text to be performed is congruous to the efficacy of the production company. Therefore, from this, we can define the dramaturg as an artistic mediator and translator. Another definition of the dramaturg that can be considered is what The Dramaturgs Network notes, how the position of a dramaturg is constantly being considered a ‘luxury and not a rooted position in the theatre industry’. This is due to the vague definition of a dramaturg, dramaturgs duties can easily described as the duties of the assistant director or a literary manager. But it is possible to refer to the term and practice of mise-en-scene and how this process is unique to the duties of the dramaturg. Unlike a director, a dramaturg researches the mise-en-scene of a piece of work both on and off the stage. And unlike a literary manager, the dramaturg must understand the artistic and practical work that is involved. Therefore a dramaturg is a practical artist like a mettre-en-scene. So what does this mythical creature do?

Being a dramaturg is an ongoing consistent process of development. A dramaturg must always know what is happening within the theatre industry, what theatre productions are running, what they are about, do they refer to any social or political issues of the day, and also issues other practitioners are discussing, new waves of theatre and theatre making. Therefore, a dramaturg must be subsumed with theatre and dramatic practice. To understand a bit more of what a dramaturg does it can be broken down into the following tasks, this is an example they can differ with other dramaturgs, 1. Research and development: understanding what the text/ performance is, where it stands in the current theatrical climate, analysing political, social, cultural etc. implications or messages. 2. Understanding the needs and desires of the writer, director, dancer, company, what are the problems they are facing, 3. Creating reports as to what can be improved, 4. Setting up and developing workshops to help the work being created, 5. Constant work and advice with the writer, 6. Liaises with all members on and off stage as to what should be created to convey the best performance.

One of the questions my professor posed to me while I was doing my Masters Degree was about defining a dramaturg. I asked him simply what is a dramaturg and he effortlessly replied ‘it depends on the context’. I obviously listened with tremendous frustration, but later realized he was completely right. A dramaturg’s role differs in relation to the artistic structure. For example, it can be divided into the following: new writing, translations, adaptions and multi disciplinary collaborations. A dramaturg can decide to have proficient skills in all contexts or can specify to hone their skills in on one or two of them. Mary Luckhurst beautifully calls a dramaturg a ‘script doctor’, a person who with the skills of an editor, the knowledge of a stage manager and the voice of a director. Here are some topics of interest to all artists where a dramaturg can help you and the success of your work.

1. Emerging artists/playwrights:- a dramaturg can help you find your voice and place as to where your work is best suited. They can help you frame your work into a cohesive structure and strategy; e.g. creating creative plans as to how you approach your work. Help you define and redefine you own personal style. Giving you a broad amount of information about the theatre industry and creating a strategy where you can produce your work.
2. Established companies and playwrights:- assisting the director with creative decisions, staging, costume, character development. The dramaturg provides continual dramaturgical analysis that captures and reviews the play in its entirety with research of the intended vision; e.g. a dramaturg here is a mediator between the artists and the stage.
3. Theatres or general artistic institutions:- they can be used to help programme the yearly events, with reference to audience development and/or creative development and expansion.

If you are an upcoming dramaturg, or are within the industry and want to become a dramaturg you need to contemplate the following. (I have been witnessing many upcoming theatre practitioners who decide to become a dramaturg because it’s basically like being a critic. It’s not!). A dramaturg encourages and assists the artist in the realisation of their vision. Don’t get it twisted, be truthful in your work not mindlessly flippant.

• What is a dramaturg? What would I do if I was a dramaturg? Get an understanding of the meaning of a dramaturg and then outline your overall aim as a dramaturg.
• What does a dramaturg have to be qualified or experienced in? You must understand the arduous amount of work that it entails to become a dramaturg.
• What is my aim or objective in choosing such a profession? For this question you can make a work mantra for yourself that you would like to follow, or an artistic policy and mission statement. This question is especially valuable when people ask you about you and your work.
• What is a dramaturg’s position to the process or structure of dramaturgy? This is a big question, so takes some time to answer it. Keep in mind what has been said briefly in this entry.

Research about what has been done previously by Dramaturgs, even into where the word dramaturg came from, where does it originate? Become familiar to what is happening currently with dramaturgs, what are they doing and talking about. And don’t forget to check out websites such as Dramaturgs Network, Ideas Tap, Culture Hive, The Stage, newspapers and other blogs made by dramaturgs. Stay tuned to this blog for more entries of interest and artistic outbursts. AND don’t forget: Never let anyone deter you from what you want to do in theatre land, if they don’t provide the same creativity and kindness, give them the ole ‘fuck you’.

If you could leave comments about your experiences I would love to hear them, good, bad or indifferent. Thank you for reading!

All rights reserved to Katie Poushpom, k.e.cleary. Robbers will be punished severely.

Leave a comment

Filed under theatre explorations